PPP Funding over $150,000 in Fitness and Recreation Sport Centers

The coronavirus led to business shutdowns in an effort to contain the spread, as well as the Federal Government to pass the CARES act to help individuals and small businesses. Part of this is the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), where banks lent money to small businesses through the Small Business Administration (SBA) with low interest and were backed by the Federal Reserve (Mercado, 2020). Generally, if at least 60% of this lent money was used to support workers, the balance of the loan could be forgiven. Overall, $525 Billion was lent through this program with the majority being smaller loans. There were 662,215 loans made to businesses in excess of $150,000 that were categorized based on level of spending and the details of the loan are publicly available (SBA). In an effort to understand who was lent money, the SBA also asked for additional details, which may not have been provided, on gender, ethnicity, veteran owned, non-profit status and lending institution.

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is used to classify businesses for statistical use to understand the United States Economy (U.S. Census Bureau, 2020). There are several NAICS codes that apply to sport, with the largest sector being NAICS 713940; fitness and recreational sports centers. According to NAICS data, there are 134,100 businesses in this sector which is 44% of the total number of sport and recreation related businesses (Table 1). According to leading industry trade association, the International Health, Racquet and Sportsclub Association (IHRSA), there were 39,570 gyms in 2018 (Rodriguez, 2019). Fitness and recreation were one of the sectors most impacted by the coronavirus shutdowns.

To determine the PPP funds that went to the fitness and recreational sport centers, the SBA dataset was downloaded for all loans made over $150,000. This was further subdivided into the businesses that exist in the sport section and then isolated to those businesses with NAICS code 713940. The restriction to funds in excess of $150,000 was due to availability of the data, for funds less than this amount, there were higher identifiers collected and it was organized by state rather than in a single file.

Results of the data illustrate that a total of 1,775 businesses in the fitness and recreational sport sector received funding in excess of $150,000 with each state, two territories (Guam and Puerto Rico) and Washington, DC represented. Funds were organized into categories with 1,177 businesses receiving funds between $150-350,000, 473 businesses receiving funds between $350,000-1 Million, 81 businesses with funding between $1-2 Million, 43 businesses with funds between $2-5Million and 5 receiving funds between $5-10 Million. There were a total of 103 (5.8%) that were listed as female owned and 217 (12.2%) categorized as non-profits. Since this was not a mandatory field to be completed, it is unknown if there were more.

The states with the most businesses receiving funding are California (263), New York (179), Illinois and Massachusetts with 87 and Florida and Texas with 84. These six states represented 45% of the total businesses that received PPP funds (Table 2). Rounding out the top 10 were New Jersey (82), Washington (69), Pennsylvania (63) and Virginia (60). These ten states received 59% of the total PPP funding received for this sector.

The total jobs that were supported by the PPP were 137,852. The top ten states for job support were California (16,245), New York (12,061), Illinois (7,950), Massachusetts (7,228), Pennsylvania (6,703), New Jersey (6,491), Florida (6,204), Texas (6,003), Ohio (4,413) and North Carolina (4,371). These ten states comprise 56% of the total jobs supported by PPP funding (Table 3). An assessment of the lenders show that JP Morgan Chase issued 117 loans, Bank of America issued 83, Wells Fargo issued 40, TD Bank issued 38, US Bank issued 28 and PNC Bank with 26. These are six of ten largest banks by assets in the United States (Phaneuf, 2019). City National Bank issued 30 loans, Truist and the Huntington Bank each issued 25 loans, Manufacturers and Traders Trust issued 23 loans, as did Fifth Third Bank.

Unfortunately, these results do not include total funds lent to fitness and recreational sport centers, but it does provide insight into gyms that received higher levels of funds. The 1,775 businesses that received funds supported 137,852 jobs in 50 states, two territories and Washington, DC. It would appear that there are differences in where the funding went, with California and New York businesses received 25% of total funds. The top ten states of businesses receiving funding comprise 59% of total funds. The jobs supported are similar, with California and New York supporting 21% of total jobs and the top ten supporting 56% of total jobs. Two of the largest banks by assets also issued the most loans, JP Morgan Chase with 117 and Bank of America with 83.

Further evaluation should attempt to determine the total number of fitness and recreational sport businesses that received funding at all levels. Since these funds are meant to provide financial support for coronavirus shutdowns and pay employees it is vital to understand the number of businesses that received these funds. Since it is also possible that these loans are eligible for forgiveness if the funds are used for approved expenses, the businesses that receive them have an advantage over those that do not. How wide spread this disparity is, is not fully known. What is known is that 66% of the funding over $150,000 was between $150-350,000.

The results indicate that just 5.8% of the businesses that received funding were female owned. If this is reflective of the ownership of businesses in this sector is not known since this was not a mandatory field. If it is reflective, then much work remains to be done supporting women owned businesses in this field and their ability to acquire loans. Non-profit businesses comprised 12.2% of the total businesses. The lack of minority completed forms makes it difficult to determine the ethnic breakdown of the funds, so it would appear that more work is required. The collection and dissemination of PPP funds is helpful for understanding what businesses are receiving funds, and if this is an indication of the sector, there is a lack of female and minority owned businesses in fitness and recreational sport centers. 

References
Mercado, D. (2020, November 2). PPP loan borrowers are being steered toward forgiveness. Why they should slow down. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/02/ppp-loan-borrowers-shoved-into-forgiveness-why-they-should-slow-down.html
Paycheck Protection Program loan data. (2020, August 20). U.S. Small Business Association.
Phaneuf, A. (2019, August 26). Here is a list of the largest banks in the United States by assets in 2020. Business Insider. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/largest-banks-us-list
Rodriguez, M. (2019, March 28). Latest IHRSA data: Over 6B visits to 39,570 gyms in 2018. IHRSA. Retrieved from  https://www.ihrsa.org/about/media-center/press-releases/latest-ihrsa-data-over-6b-visits-to-39-570-gyms-in-2018/
United States Census Bureau. (2020). North American Industry Classification System. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/